The Mail on Sunday editor has refused to meet with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle over the paper’s controversial report about MP Angela Rayner.
Sir Lindsay told MPs on Monday he had arranged a meeting with David Dillion following an outcry over anonymous claims the Labour deputy leader crossed and uncrossed her legs during Prime Minister’s Questions to distract Boris Johnson.
But in his response to the Speaker, published in the Daily Mail, Mr Dillon said he would not be attending, as journalists should “not take instruction from officials of the House of Commons, however august they may be”.
In his letter, he wrote: “The Mail on Sunday deplores sexism and misogyny in all its forms. However journalists must be free to report what they are told by MPs about conversations which take place in the House of Commons, however unpalatable some may find them.”
He said while The Mail on Sunday had “the greatest possible respect both for your office and for Parliament [which] along with a free press they are the foundation stones of British democracy”, the invitation would be declined.
Sir Lindsay had said he wanted to use the meeting to ask that “we are all a little kinder”, issuing a plea to reporters to consider the feelings of MPs and their families when covering stories in Parliament.
Some MPs had called for The Mail on Sunday’s political editor Glen Owen – who wrote the report about Ms Rayner – to have his Commons pass removed.
Angela Rayner: Article claiming Tory MPs accuse her of Basic Instinct ploy to distract PM ‘misogynistic’, ‘sexist’ and ‘steeped in classism’
Angela Rayner remarks: Speaker summons newspaper editor over ‘demeaning’ article
Angela Rayner and Boris Johnson condemn ‘sexist’ and ‘misogynistic’ Mail on Sunday article claiming Tory MPs accuse her of ‘Basic Instinct’ ploy to distract PM
And, in an apparent comeback to Mr Dillon’s “free press” comments, Sir Lindsay pointed out he had only recently rejected calls to remove the parliamentary pass from another journalist.
“I am a staunch believer and protector of press freedom, which is why when an MP asked me to remove the pass of a sketch writer last week for something he had written, I said ‘no’,” he said.
“I firmly believe in the duty of reporters to cover Parliament, but I would also make a plea – nothing more – for the feelings of all MPs and their families to be considered, and the impact on their safety, when articles are written. I would just ask that we are all a little kinder.
“That is what I wanted to talk about at tomorrow’s meeting.”
After the article appeared in last weekend’s Mail on Sunday the Prime Minister tweeted that he respected Ms Rayner and deplored the “misogyny directed at her anonymously today”.
However, Commons Leader Mark Spencer said that while the person had acted in an “inappropriate” way, he did not think they broke any rule in the House.
Appearing on ITV’s Lorraine programme on Tuesday, Ms Rayner said she had appealed to the paper not to run the story, based on claims by an unnamed Tory MP.
“When I heard the story was coming out and we rebutted it instantly… like this is disgusting, it’s completely untrue, please don’t run a story like that,” she said.
“All I worry about when I’m at the despatch box is doing a good job and being able to do justice to my constituents and the work I’m doing, so I was just really crestfallen that somebody had said that to a paper and a paper was reporting that.”