The former king of Spain has begun an appeal bid after losing a High Court fight with an ex-lover who has accused him of spying on and harassing her.
Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, a Danish businesswoman, has taken legal action against Juan Carlos, who abdicated in 2014, and is seeking damages for personal injury.
Carlos, 84, denies wrongdoing and disputes claims made against him.
Lawyers representing the former monarch argued that he was “entitled to immunity from the jurisdiction of the English courts in his capacity as a senior member of the Spanish royal family”.
But a High Court judge disagreed.
Mr Justice Nicklin ruled earlier this year that the claim could go ahead in England.
Two Court of Appeal judges in July allowed Juan Carlos to challenge some of the conclusions reached by Mr Justice Nicklin.
US midterms latest: Voting starts in elections that could affect US ‘for decades’ – with Trump, Biden (and Musk) making late appeals
Ukraine war: Russia and US ‘discuss holding talks on nuclear weapons’ – as Putin’s troops ‘prepare for street fighting’
COP27 latest: Pakistan makes emotional plea; ‘deep fault line’ emerges at summit; UK ‘close to energy deal with US’
Three appeal judges, Lady Justice King, Lady Justice Simler and Lord Justice Popplewell, are due to consider detailed arguments at a Court of Appeal hearing in London.
Lawyers representing Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn have argued that the former king’s appeal bid should be dismissed.
Judges have heard how Juan Carlos ruled from 1975 until his abdication in June 2014 and the succession of his son King Felipe VI.
They have been told that Ms zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, who lives in England and has a home in Shropshire, wants an “injunction and damages” resulting from “a continuous and ongoing campaign of harassment” against her, “commenced” by the former king from 2012, following the “break-up of an intimate romantic relationship” and her “refusal to let (the former king) use a financial sum irrevocably gifted to her, or to return other gifts”.
Lawyers representing her have alleged to judges that conduct “includes (the former king) or his agents smearing her and her business in the media, following her, entering her home in Shropshire, and bugging her homes and electronic devices”.
Mr Justice Nicklin rejected the argument that, despite his abdication, Carlos remained a “sovereign” and was entitled to personal immunity under the State Immunity Act 1978.
He had also said Carlos was not a member of the current king’s household within the meaning of that act.
Mr Justice Nicklin said the former king’s position under the Spanish constitution was “entirely honorary” and provided him “no continuing role”.
